Scan to know paper details and author's profile

Table of contents

1.

(Hull, 2022;Paloma et al. 2021)

. Even in the tourism industry, this has become a trend now. This new class of customers wants the value created by businesses to benefit society and the environment in addition to shareholder profits. From the business perspective, investors are seeking companies that have been incorporating sustainable practices into their processes and policies as a result of this changing customer behavior (Ottaviani et al. 2023; Wu & Jin, 2022; Hull, 2022;Swarnapali, 2017). The more organizations that embrace sustainability initiatives, the better for the environment, their long-term consumer retention rates, and their profitability (Grant, 2020).

Practices that promote sustainability are justifiable when they help an organization, and its stakeholders achieve their requirements today without harming the needs of future generations (Kaftan et al. 2023; Wu & Jin, 2022; Dyllick and Hockerts, 2002). Sustainability initiatives also cover a business's obligations to society and the environment. Many It is believed that an organization can perform at different levels in terms of corporate sustainability depending on the semantic value that is considered (Pranugrahaning et al. 2021).

It has been noted that the notion of corporate sustainability can have varied meanings depending on the context in which it is employed (Runtuk et al. 2023;Swarnapali, 2017). It is crucial to comprehend the motivations behind a firms's sustainability initiatives and how trustworthy this data appears to be. In this regard, the purpose of this research is to conduct a comprehensive literature review on the corporate sustainability practices of the hotel industry that have been published in online indexed journals over the last two decades, to identify the corporate sustainability practices of hotels used for assessing corporate sustainability. The article is divided into five sections: Section 1-Introduction; Section 2 describes the Methodology; Section 3 displays the Analysis of the papers; Section 4 Discussion & conclusion; and Section 5 Implications.

2. II. METHODOLOGY

This particular study has used a literature search strategy based on earlier review articles to examine studies on corporate sustainability in the hospitality sector and other related topics that had been produced by academics. The terms corporate sustainability and sustainability practices were used in an electronic search of publications in tourism, hospitality, business, and management.

It restricted the search to articles written in the most recent 20 years, or from 2003 to 2022. 41 papers were found in the initial results of the search. Each report underwent a screening process to determine whether or not its essential relevance to corporate sustainability could be determined. As Seuring and Müller (2008), revealed, the review follows the four-step iterative process: (i) material collection; (ii) descriptive analysis; (iii) category selection; and (iv) material analysis. The systematic examination of the literature analysis aids in providing a comprehensive knowledge of corporate sustainability in hotel literature that has been the subject of previous studies. The conclusion would point out the overlooked areas and offer suggestions for further research.

3. Material Collection

The process of gathering the material begins with the definition of the search terms and other criteria. As Creswell & Creswell (2017) mentioned, it is advisable to start the search in computerized databases that contain peer-reviewed papers. The reputed online research journals were chosen for this investigation since they are the top platforms for scientific inquiry and analytical information worldwide (Runtuk et al. 2023;Yan Li, et al. 2017). Forty-one papers that were subjected to a preliminary examination based on the title, keywords and abstract were found by the search.

4. London Journal of Research in Management and Business

Following that, 13 papers were eliminated, leaving 28 articles that were fully read. Then, the procedure was established for the inclusion or exclusion of documents: they should assess the existing corporate sustainability practices of hospitality businesses.

5. Category Selection

This step defines the main determinants and analytical categories that will be utilized to assess the articles. As Seuring and Müller (2008) depicted, the primary subjects of analysis are fundamental dimensions, which are made up of analytical categories. NVivo was the program the researcher utilized to help this phase. Parameters and their associated analytical categories were discovered as the researcher studied the papers.

Then, these categories were encoded and put into a hierarchy structure using NVivo. NVivo produces a nod, which is a construct to hold data collected from the papers, for each text fragment that has been decoded. This approach enables the identification of the dimensions and key metrics used in the models for evaluating corporate sustainability practices, as well as the sources used to assess the metrics and the industries for which the indicators were suggested.

6. III. ANALYSIS

Understanding the advantages and disadvantages of the study, as well as spotting any research gaps that need additional attention, are the three main objectives of the analysis (Leonidou et al. 2020).

7. Distribution of papers over the period

Even though our review covers the period 2003-2022, there are only a few papers were published during the first 12 years period. As per the chart depicted, there were only 09 published papers during the first 12 years (2003-2015). As a percentage, it is around 32% of the total of 28 articles. The rest of 68% of the papers (19 papers) were published during the last 07 years. In the year 2015, the world confirmed its commitment to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, which is an action program for people, the planet, and prosperity to improve the quality of life (Pereira et al. 2021). This explains why there have been more publications in the last seven years: between 2015 and 2022, around 70% of papers on corporate sustainability practices of the hotel industry, were published during that period.

8. Corporate Sustainability Dimensions

In around 65% of the cases (18 papers), corporate sustainability practices were assessed considering the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) concepts, that is, environmental, economic, and social dimensions.

Although the Triple Bottom Line of sustainability has been taken into consideration by certain researchers, the social dimension was modeled using a viewpoint that is centered on the health and safety of persons. Accomplishing sustainability requires businesses to ensure long-term viability, the social welfare of their partners, such as consumers, suppliers, and staff members, as well as the minimization of the adverse effects of their operations on the environment (Pereira et al. 2021). Sustainability now concerns a fundamental goal, enhancing the promote legislation from regulatory entities and the liable actions by organizations and individuals.

9. Environmental Practices

The process of creating value depends on taking a proactive approach toward the environment and implementing suitable environmental methods and technologies (Hossein et al. 2020) The hotel sector or lodging industry shift to "going green" is characterized by a rising focus on limiting its environmental effect by implementing environmentally preferable waste-reduction methods and by using sustainable techniques and suppliers (Nagendrakumar et al. 2022; Boley and Uysal, 2013). As Suluo (2020) mentioned, authorities in several nations have imposed more substantial environmental restrictions and urged businesses to take action to safeguard the environment due to increasingly significant environmental issues, such as global warming.

Many lodging establishments understand that implementing green practices is not only morally right but also advantageous in terms of cost savings, image improvement, market positioning, and increased CSR (Hossein et al. 2020). As Kularathne et al. ( 2019) depicted, the comanagement of any lodging establishment not only contributes to its revenue and ability to retain guests but also shows better social commitment and enhances its reputation.

10. Social Practices

The social dimension of corporate sustainability attempts to improve the happiness of the staff, other suppliers, the visitor, and the local community at large by, among other things, offering proper training, a safe workplace, fair deals, building long-term collaborations, and more (Siddique et al.

11. Economic Practices

The "economic aspect" of business sustainability is frequently called the generic dimension. In addition to environmental and social considerations, economic sustainability includes general organizational characteristics that must be upheld for a business to last a long time (Nagendrakumar et al. 2022; Pereira et al. 2021).

Moreover, the economic aspect of corporate sustainability involves the creation of profits and the enhance the business market share while creating a deficient level of social and environmental impacts (Kassinis & Soteriou, 2009). The economic aspect of corporate sustainability encourages increased consumption of products and services, which eventually raises the standard of living for people. This is about the profit-driven mindset of large corporations and offers hoteliers the chance to establish a win-win scenario through the deployment of effective, sustainable initiatives that would benefit the environment and yield them a more significant profit over the long term ( According to the prevailing literature, sustainability is based on three dimensions; social, economic, and environmental. In terms of the environment, the hotel sector must use environmentally friendly products, control prevailing water wastage, fix alternative energy sources, use technology for power saving, use natural light, recycling of plastics and glass, creation of internal policies to reduce the wastage, keep ecosystems viable and healthy by taking into account the carbon footprint of food, building development, transportation of staff and visitors to and from the facility. As the social aspect, the hospitality sector requires to enhance the daily lives and wellbeing of either their community or their customers by participating in taking actions to alleviate education and poverty, offering donations to the locals, and voluntary activities for the wellbeing of the local community, creating long-term partnerships with suppliers, providing high-quality services and products and a safe environment for consumers, create a safe and healthy work environment, comply with labor legislation and employee contracts, treating all consumers fairly. Economic perspective, the hotel sector must maintain the profit-driven mindset of entrepreneurs and offers hoteliers the chance to establish a win-win situation by utilizing practical sustainable efforts such as recruiting locals to the staff, additional benefits for employees, paying staff above the industry average, encouraging guests to use locally made products, contribute to charitable activities, select suppliers who contribute to local development, assess the company's economic impact. Moreover, the corporate sustainability practices of each dimension are constructed using various sources of information through the selected papers: we counted the number of corporate sustainability practices. In the systematic literature survey, many authors have concluded from their systematic study that the literature had primarily addressed the environmental element of sustainability, leaving out the economic and social dimensions of sustainability in hotels.

12. V. IMPLICATIONS

This study's primary objective was to examine sustainable corporate practices in the hospitality industry by looking through a wide range of article variations publicly available online. This article can be utilized as a fundamental overview of corporate sustainability practices made in the hospitality sector between 2003 and 2022 from around the world by addressing various cultures that are engaged effectively in adopting sustainability initiatives in the hospitality sector. This scientific report is a helpful resource for hotels, organizations, and even students looking for ideas for fresh initiatives they may also adopt in their hospitality establishments. Moreover, this research work is significant for hotel management because it identifies different corporate sustainability dimensions and practices that can be adopted to lower energy and water usage and improve economic outcomes through incorporation as a collection of practices that can be used as benchmarks. Additionally, this study demonstrates how vital the eco-friendly operation & service delivery discussed in the literature is to the long-term sustainability of lodging sector.

Figure 1. Chart 1 :
1
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
The subject of sustainability is vital for hotels
since the lodging industry contributes
significantly to environmental issues by using up
resources like water and energy (Kaftan et al.
2023; Hull, 2022; Verma & Chandra, 2018). The
damaging effects of hotels on the environment are
a growing concern. The vast and rapid expansion
of the hotel business makes it essential for hotels
to embrace ecologically sustainable practices
(Paloma et al. 2021). As per Hepper et al. (2017)
depicted, corporate sustainability entails putting
systematic efforts into the organizations' strategy
to reduce adverse effects on the environment and
society brought on by its processes. As Runtuk et
al. (2023) mentioned, the volume of references to
corporate sustainability and sustainable strategy
has significantly increased during the last few
decades. Over time, investors' understanding of
sustainability as a workable corporate strategy has
grown. In keeping with this development,
academic writers have increasingly focused on
corporate sustainability initiatives. The
Brundtland Report, published in 1987, served as
the primary inspiration for the notion of corporate
sustainability (Wu & Jin, 2022; Hull, 2022;
Bhatia & Tuli, 2015).
Figure 6.
Note:

A portion of this industry is still hesitant to support sustainable initiatives (Hossein et. al, 2020). Research works & investigations on the sustainability of the tourism & hospitality industry have gained far less attention than manufacturing activities, still the expanding number of sustainability concerns and developing market pressures have enhanced its sustainability awareness (Pereira et al. 2021). Moreover, as the biggest sub-sector of the tourism industry, the hospitality sector unquestionably has the widest range of environmental effects (Paloma et al. 2021). Sustainability thus becomes a significant and essential component, not only for enhancing the natural environment but also for sustaining this industry's competitive performance (Hossein et al. 2020).

Figure 7. Table 1 :
1
They chose the label "employee safety" for the
third dimension rather than the term "social,"
which covered topics like education and training
programs, the usage of personal safety equipment,
etc. Madan et al. (2017), have discussed the
above-mentioned aspect. Other than that, Ajmal
et al. (2017) has been concerned about the health
and safety aspect of corporate customers. Some
studies take into account an extra component in
addition to TBL, which includes concerns with
corporate ethics, strategies, and stakeholder
interactions. The scholars (Hogrefe & Bohnet,
2022; Hull, 2022; Aras et al. 2017; Schrippe and
Ribeiro, 2019; Wang and Dai, 2018) who have
written about this fourth dimension of corporate
sustainability have been called authors of
governance, corporate governance. Gurumurthy
(2018) has introduced an additional dimension
for conflict management and organizational
image. Alcívar et al. (2020) presented a fourth
dimension mentioned as the corporate identity,
which concerns the company's vision and mission.
Though some scholars have talked about the
fourth component, the majority have focused on
the main three dimensions (economic, environ-
ment, social) of corporate sustainability.
Note:

Environmental Dimension Nagendrakumar et. Al., (2022); Smith and Grosbois, (2011); Esteban et. al, (2017); Nikolaou et. al, (2019); Montilla et al. (2020); Nallusamy et al. (2015); Silva et. al, (2014); Ulrike, (2020); Danijela et. al, (2016); Kularathne, (2018); Bresjin, (2019); Gavilanes et. al., (2019); Huang et. al., (2015); Kanchan, (2019).

Figure 8.
important in the hotel sector. The topic of
sustainability has increasingly taken center stage
in discussions of both societal and political
importance. Starting in 2015, academics have
begun to pay more attention to corporate
sustainability assessment. It is believed that the
majority of publications have been focused on in
the previous five years is a result of the agenda
2030 for Sustainable Development, which was
introduced in 2015. The several interpretations of
the meaning of "corporate sustainability" were
used in the literature we analyzed; typically, this
notion is based on the tripod of economic-
social-environmental factors.
London Journal of Research in Management and Business No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Economic practices Whenever possible recruit locals to the staff. Pay staff above the industry average. Provision of additional benefits for employees. Encourage guests to consume/use locally made/purchased products. Encourage guests to contribute to charitable activities. Select suppliers who contribute to local development. Assess the company's economic impact Author / Author of the paper and the year of the publication Nagendrakumar et. Al., (2022); Garay & Font, (2013); Kim, Barber, & Kim, (2019); Petri & Mikuli, (2012); Hossein et. al, (2020); Hussain et.al, (2017) Hristov & Chirico (2019); Garay & Font, (2013); Kim, Barber, & Kim, (2019); Petri & Mikuli, (2012); Chindu & Bhattacharya, (2019); Rupert & Ebner, (2010) Hussain et.al, (2017); Garay & Font, (2013); Kim, Barber, & Kim, (2019); Chindu & Bhattacharya, (2019) Nagendrakumar et. Al., (2022); Kim, Barber, & Kim, (2019); Pereira et. al,(2021); Hossein et. al, (2020); Hristov & Chirico (2019); Rupert & Ebner, (2010) Garay & Font, (2013); Kim, Barber, & Kim, (2019); Petri & Mikuli, (2012); Hristov & Chirico (2019) Hussain et.al, (2017);Garay & Font, (2013); Kim, Barber, & Kim, (2019); Hossein et. al, (2020) Garay & Font, (2013); Kim, Barber, & Kim, (2019); Petri & Mikuli, (2012); Chindu & Bhattacharya, (2019)
Nagendrakumar et. Al., (2022); Garay & Font, (2013);
8 Provide training programs for staff Kim, Barber, & Kim, (2019); Petri & Mikuli, (2012);
Rupert & Ebner, (2010)
IV. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION of the research, present a wide range of
viewpoints and practices in corporate
The topic of corporate sustainability in hospitality
sustainability across the globe, and give hoteliers
sparked a lot of attention globally. Numerous
and viewers of this research a well-rounded
articles featuring the phrase "sustainable in
information foundation on such initiatives,
hotels" in the title were published between 2003
several research bases were used in this study.
and 2022. It is a tendency that has global
implications for the pursuit of justice, equity, and As Harmon (2017) depicted, in the previous ten
development for all populations within and years, sustainability has been increasingly
between generations. To enhance the credibility
1
2

Appendix A

Appendix A.1

Boon. (2019). Do environmentally sustainable practices make hotels more efficient? A study of major hotels in Sri Lanka. Tourism Management. 71. 213

Appendix B

  1. A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain, A Alcívar , M.-J Verdecho , J.-J Alfaro-Saiz . 2020. (Sustainability)
  2. Sustainability Disclosure Practices: A Study of Selected Chinese Companies. A Bhatia , S Tuli . Management and Labour Studies 2015. 40 (3-4) p. .
  3. Regional network governance and sustainable tourism. A Farmaki . Tourism Geographies 2015. 17 (3) p. .
  4. Corporate sustainability assessments: A systematic literature review and conceptual framework. Agnes Pranugrahaning , Jerome D Donovan , Cheree Topple , K Eryadi , Masli . Journal of Cleaner Production 2021.
  5. Where is the 'struggle' in communications for social progress?, A Gurumurthy . 2018. Global Media and Communication. 14 p. .
  6. Competitive synergy through practicing triple bottom line sustainability: Evidence from three hospitality case studies, B B Boley , M Uysal . 2013. Tourism and Hospitality Research.
  7. Hotel's best practices as a strategic driver for environmental sustainability and green marketing. Chindu Chandran , & Prodyut Bhattacharya . Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science 2019. 29 (2) p. .
  8. Economic, social and environmental dimension of sustainable competitiveness of European countries. Danijela Despotovic , Slobodan Cvetanovic , Vladimir Nedic , Milan Despotovic . Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2016. 59 (9) p. .
  9. Looking from a local lens: Inbound tour operators and sustainable tourism in Kenya. E Cavagnaro , S Staffieri , F Ngesa . Research in Hospitality Management 2015. 5 (2) p. .
  10. Proposing a Maturity Model for Corporate Sustainability. E L Hepper , O T De Souza , M D C Petrini , C E L E Silva . Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences 2017. 39 (1) p. .
  11. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices in the hospitality industry in Malawi. F G Bello , W Banda , G Kamanga . African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure 2017. 6 (3) p. .
  12. Corporate Sustainability Measurement Based on Entropy Weight and TOPSIS. G Aras , N Tezcan , O Kutlu Furtuna , E Hacioglu Kazak . Meditari Accountancy Research 2017. 25 (3) p. .
  13. Greening the service profit chain: the impact of environmental management practices, G I Kassinis , A C Soteriou . 2009. Production and Operations Management. 12 p. .
  14. Ainur Kenebayeva & Dogan Gursoy (2020): Hotels' sustainability practices and guests' familiarity, attitudes and behaviours. Hossein Olya , Levent Altinay , Anna Farmaki . Journal of Sustainable Tourism
  15. Competitive Sustainability: The Intersection of Sustainability and Business Success. Sustainability, Hull . 2022. 14 p. 16420.
  16. The Role of Sustainability Key Performance Indicators (Kpis) in Implementing Sustainable Strategies, I Hristov , A Chirico . 2019. (Sustainability)
  17. Sustainable Practices in Luxury Class and First-Class Hotels of Guayaquil, Ecuador. ROSA DOS VENTOS-Turismo e Hospitalidade, J E Gavilanes , C F Ludeña , Y J Cassagne . 2019. 11 p. .
  18. J W Creswell , J D Creswell . Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2017. (th ed.)
  19. Measuring environmental orientation in hotels: empirical evidence from Sri Lanka. Kanchana Wickramasinghe . Anatolia 2019. 30 (3) p. .
  20. Sustainable supply chain management: A case study of British aerospace systems. K Gopalakrishnan , Y Y Yusuf , A Musa , T Abubakar , H M Ambursa . International Journal of Production Economics 2012. 140 (1) p. .
  21. Mastering employee turnover intention in the modern workforce. K Kasemsap . Social issues in the workplace: Breakthroughs in research and practice, 2018. IGI Publishing/IGI Global. p. .
  22. Analysis and benchmarking of greenhouse gas emissions of luxury hotels. K T Huang , J C Wang , Y C Wang . Int. J. Hosp. Manag 2015. 51 p. .
  23. Doing good to do well? Corporate social responsibility reasons, practices and impacts in small and medium accommodation enterprises. L Garay , X Font . International Journal of Hospitality Management 2013. 31 (2) p. .
  24. Strategic Management and Sustainability in Luxury Companies: The IWC Case. Luana Carcano . Journal of Corporate Citizenship 2013. 2013.
  25. A closer look at the 'Global Reporting Initiative' sustainability reporting as a tool to implement environmental and social policies: A worldwide sector analysis. M Alonso-Almeida , J Llach , F Marimon . Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag 2014. 21 p. .
  26. M H Kabir . Corporate social responsibility by Swaziland hotel industry, 2011. 25 p. .
  27. Prioritizing Sustainable Practices of Service Organizations. M Hussain , A Alameeri , MM . International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector 2017. 9 (1) p. .
  28. Development of Indicators for the Social Dimension of Sustainability in a U.S. Business Context. M J Hutchins , J S Richter , M L Henry , J W Sutherland . Journal of Cleaner Production 2019. 212 p. .
  29. An evaluation study of the "RESTART" programshort-term residential treatment for addiction. M L E Chan , W T N Cheung , N Y D Yeung , F P A Kwok , H Y Wong . International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 2018. 16 p. .
  30. Conceptualizing and Incorporating Social Sustainability in the Business World. M M Ajmal , M Khan , M Hussain , P Helo . International Journal of Sustainable London Journal of Research in Management and Business Development & World Ecology 2018. 25 (4) p. .
  31. Sustainability in the hospitality industry: Some personal reflections on corporate challenges and research agendas. P Jones , D Hillier , D Comfort . International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 2016. 28 (1) p. .
  32. Integrating corporate sustainability and sustainable development goals: towards a multi-stakeholder framework, Pratap Avinash , Zillur Singh , Rahman . 2021. Cogent Business & Management.
  33. The Social Dimension of Corporate Sustainability: Review of an Evolving Research Field. R Hogrefe , S Bohnet-Joschko . Sustainability 2022. 15 p. 3248.
  34. The Effect of Entrepreneurial Marketing on Outcome Goals in SMEs. Richard C Becherer , Marilyn M Helms , John P Mcdonald . New England Journal of Entrepreneurship 2014. 15 (1) p. 3.
  35. Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability. T Dyllick , K Hockerts . Business Strategy and the Environment 2002. 11 (2) p. .
  36. , Thamarasi Kularatne , Wilson , Jonas & Clevo & Månsson , Hoang , & Vincent , Lee . London Journal of Research in Management and Business
  37. Understanding sustainability. https://www.investo-pedia.com/terms/s/sustainability.asp London Journal of Research in Management and Business M Grant (ed.) 2020. 22.
  38. Cultural Values on CSR Patterns and Evolution: A Study from the Biplot Representation. V A Esteban , M P G Villardón , I M G Sánchez . Ecological Indicators 2017. 81 p. .
  39. Socio-Economic Stability and Sustainable Development in the Post-COVID Era: Lessons for the. V Kaftan , W Kandalov , I Molodtsov , A Sherstobitova , W Strielkowski . Business and Economic Leaders. Sustainability 2023. 15 p. 2876.
  40. The future of sustainability in the hospitality industry, W Harmon . https://www.bluecart.com/blog/the-future-of-sustainability-in-the-hospitality-industry 2017.
  41. The effectiveness of managing social media on hotel performance. Woo Kim , Hyunjung Lim , Robert Brymer . International Journal of Hospitality Management 2015. 44 p. .
  42. Sustainability research in the hotel industry: Past, present, and future. Y H Kim , N Barber , D K Kim . J. Hosp. Mark. Manag 2015. 2015. 28 p. .
  43. Sustainability research in the hotel industry: Past, present, and future. Y H Kim , N Barber , D.-K Kim . Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management 2019. 28 (5) p. .
Notes
1

© 2023 Great ] Britain Journals Press Volume 23 | Issue 5 | Compilation 1.0

2

Corporate Sustainability Practices of Hotel Industry: A Systematic Literature Review © 2023 Great ] Britain Journals Press Volume 23 | Issue 5 | Compilation 1.0

Date: 1970-01-01