Scan to know paper details and author's profile

Table of contents

1. INTRODUCTION

The stock market of any country acts as the mirror of its economy. The economic recession, depression, and financial crisis ultimately lead to stock market crash or development. A market where the securities such as shares, debentures, etc., issued by trade is called the 'Stock market'. Likewise, the stock market plays a significant role in the individual industry and investors who want to gain maximum return on their savings (Menike, 2010). According to Bayraktar's (2014) perspective, the stock market is not only a tool for measuring industrial growth but also a means of assessing the stability of the economy. The rising market capitalization, total turnover, and market index are signs of a growing economy. If In the past, most people saved their money by investing in commercial banks to make little interest. Nowadays, most developing nations, including Sri Lanka, favour commercial banks. Theoretically, the inflation rate of the country is highly affected by interest rates because of the economic crises in the past decade; the interest rates have been decreasing rapidly with negative fluctuations. Therefore, the number of investors saving money in savings accounts decreases, and they prefer investing money in the stock market. The stock market plays a vital role in the financial sector of every economy.

An efficient capital market drives economic growth by establishing a financial sector. Over time, the significance of the financial market in the economy has increased, and various factors can now affect the stock market's performance, as noted by Badullahewage (2018).

Today's stock markets have emerged as the primary driving force behind national and global economies.

Through stock market performance, there are more economic significances we can identify. The stock market performances are very sensitive to various macroeconomic variables and changes in the level of economic activities (Kumar & Padhi, 2012). The stock market is a primary source for many companies to raise funds for business expansions. If a company wants to increase capital for the business, it can increase shares. By utilizing the primary market of the stock exchange, businesses can issue shares and acquire the necessary funds to meet their operational needs.

Considering the recorded public companies, they issue more shares to the market to gather more funds. These primary functions of the stock exchange play the most important role in supporting the growth of industry and commerce in the country.

That is why raising the stock market is a sign of a developing industrial sector and a growing economy of a country. Moreover, the stock market helps the redistribution of wealth through stock price increases, and dividends enhance share in the wealth of portfolio business. The price of the share is decided by the demand and supply for the share. However, it is not the only factor that affects the share price. Other factors that affect the share price are company performance, economic factors, and the country's current political situation. The uncontrollable nature of share price is evident in its susceptibility to macroeconomic variables. It provides some indication of the impact of macroeconomic variables on stock prices. The main focus of this research is to investigate the influence of macroeconomic variables on the stock market's performance in the Colombo Stock Exchange.

As well as the potential effect of the stock exchanges on aggregate demand, especially through aggregate consumption and investment. There are a large number of investors that have invested in both domestic and international stock markets in the Sri Lankan context. The observation of the effect of macroeconomic variables on stock market performance in Sri Lanka would benefit not only portfolio managers but also economic policymakers. Also, the effect of macroeconomic variables on stock market performance is useful to evaluate how portfolio manager invests in stock heads against macroeconomic variables. Moreover, this study investigates the relationship between macroeconomic factors and the stock market performance that induce an economic policymaker to attention when decision making. These index values are calculated continuously during the trading session, with the closing values published at the end of each session (Aboocacker & Irfan, 2014). Evaluating the related literature, it is evident that macroeconomic variables such as money supply, interest rate, inflation, GDP, exchange rate, oil prices, gold price, and unemployment have been taken to measure the impact on the stock market performance. Hence, this research aimed to establish a correlation between macroeconomic indicators and the stock market's overall performance.

2. II. LITERATURE REVIEW

In this section, we are reviewing the past literature and the theoretical background related to the impact of economic variables on the Colombo stock market performances. Most of the researchers have selected aggregate economic variables to be employed in their research models, based on their countries' economic environment. The inflation rate, exchange rate, interest rate, money supply, gross domestic production, industrial production index, reserve money, crude oil price, and economic growth were the variables that were mostly selected to study macroeconomic conditions with stock market indices.

Nelson and Schwert (1977) examined how monthly stock returns correlated with inflation from 1953 to 1974 in the United States. Their findings suggested that there was an adverse correlation between stock returns and both anticipated and unanticipated inflation. Chen et al. (1986) studied the effect of macroeconomic variables on the stock market return. The researchers analyzed various factors, including short-term and long-term interest rates, expected and unexpected inflation, industrial production, and the spread between high and low-grade bonds. They collected data from 1953 to 1972 and conducted 12 cross-sectional regressions.

The results showed that macroeconomic variables, such as industrial production and risk premium fluctuations, notably affect the stock market's performance.

Al-Khazali & Pyun (2004) researched the generalized Fisher hypothesis in nine equity markets in various Asian countries such as Australia, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan, and Thailand. However, their findings showed that the generalized Fisher hypothesis was rejected in all of these countries. Based on their VAR model, they concluded that variations in stock returns cannot be explained by inflation and vice versa.

The study also found that expected inflation did not affect the stochastic process of nominal stock returns. In addition, they could not identify a consistent negative relationship between stock returns and inflation shocks in all the analyzed countries.

Ahmed (2007) investigated the correlation between the stock market and several macroeconomic indicators, including money supply, treasury bill rate, interest rate, GDP, and industrial production index. By applying a range of tests such as unit roots, co-integration, and vector error correction models, the monthly dataset for the period between July 1997 and June 2005 was analyzed. The results indicated that, in Macroeconomic Determinants of Stock Market Performances in Sri Lanka general, there was no long-term relationship between the stock market index and macroeconomic variables. However, the study did suggest that changes in the interest rate or T-bill growth rate may have some impact on the market return.

Coleman & Tettey (2008) conducted a study on the Ghana Stock Exchange's performance and how it was influenced by various macroeconomic factors. Their research utilized quarterly time series data spanning from 1991 to 2005, and they employed co-integration and 15 error correction models to analyze the data. According to their results, Treasury bill rates had a minimal impact on the stock exchange's performance, while market responses were delayed in cases of inflation.

In a study conducted by Menike (2010), the impact of macroeconomic variables on stock prices in the Sri Lankan stock market was examined. The study utilized monthly data covering the timeframe from September 1991 to December 2002, employing a multivariate linear regression method. Here, there were eight macroeconomic variables that were regressed against each stock. The results indicate that the higher explanatory power of macroeconomic variables is high in explaining the stock prices of most of the stocks listed on CSE. The study held that the inflation rate and exchange rate react negatively to stock prices. Moreover, the presence of a negative effect on the Treasury bill rate, implying that whenever the interest rate on Treasury securities rises, investors tend to switch out of stocks, causing a fall in stock prices.

Pal & Mittal (2011) investigated the long-run relationship between two Indian capital markets and macroeconomic factors such as interest rate, inflation, exchange rate and gross domestic savings using the quarterly data from January 1995 to December 2008. They performed the unit root test, cointegration and error correction mechanism and found that the inflation rate impacts one capital market. The results also indicated that the Gross domestic saving was insignificant in explaining both markets. Not only the above factors, but also stock market performance is influenced by natural disasters, infrastructure development, social welfare, political situation, and political stability. However, there are very few researchers who covered this area in their studies. Several research studies investigated that there is a positive relationship between stock market performance and economic growth.

Though Sri Lankan situation may be different, when stock market transactions are low, the impact on the country's economic activity may be limited. Therefore, possible practical influences done by sectors and segments of the economy have an impact on stock market changes.

Momani & Alsharari (2011) studied the impact of macroeconomic factors on the stock prices at the Amman Stock Market of Jordan, covering the periods of 1992-2010. The macroeconomic factors were namely: interest rate, national product, money supply, and industrial product index. The results showed a significant statistical impact on share prices. However, when each factor was examined with the indices, they found that the interest rate has a statistically significant impact on the prices of the shares in the Amman Financial Market. The effect was negative on behalf of the index and the sectors index. The production index is another variable, which had a significant impact where its impact was negative for the general sectors index except for the insurance sector, which had a positive impact.

Kumar & Padhi (2012) conducted a study to examine the correlation between the BSE Sensex, the Indian stock market index, and five macroeconomic variables: industrial production index, wholesale price index, money supply, treasury bills rates, and exchange rates. They utilized Johansen's co-integration and vector error correction model to analyze the data from 1994 to 2011 and investigate the long-term equilibrium relationship between the stock market index and the macroeconomic variables.

The findings indicated that the stock market index and the selected macroeconomic variables were co-integrated, suggesting a long-term equilibrium relationship between them. The results also Macroeconomic Determinants of Stock Market Performances in Sri Lanka revealed a positive correlation between stock prices and money supply, while industrial production exhibited a negative correlation with inflation. However, the study found that the exchange rate and short-term interest rate had no significant impact on determining stock prices. Aurangzeb (2012) studied the factor affecting the performance of the stock market in three selected South Asian countries, namely, Pakistan, India and Sri Lanka using the data collected from the period 1997 to 2010. According to the findings of the regression analysis, it was observed that the performance of the stock market in South Asian nations is positively and significantly affected by foreign direct investment and exchange rates.

Conversely, the interest rate was found to have a negative and significant impact on the stock market performance in the region. The analysis also revealed that inflation has a negative impact on the stock market performance in South Asia, but the impact was insignificant.

Aboocacker & Shehu (2014) conducted a study to investigate the impact of macroeconomic factors on the stock market performance in Sri Lanka.

The study utilized monthly data collected between January 2001 and December 2011. The independent variables of this study are inflation, exchange rate, money market rate and money supply of Sri Lanka, whereas the dependent variable is all share price index. Co-integration analysis for macroeconomic factors and all share price indices of the stock market were carried out to test for the existence and Vector Error Correction Model. It was found that both long and short-run relationships exist among the stock price index and macroeconomic variables. Using the ADF unit root test, it is shown that all the variables are integrated in the same order I (1).

According to the Johansen co-integration test results, a stable and long-term relationship exists between the variables studied.

The Johansen test procedure further supported this finding by indicating the presence of at least one co-integration equation involving the ASPI and macroeconomic variables at a significance level of 5%. The results of VEC showed that short-run relationship between the stock market index, money market rate and money supply. Badullahewage (2018) conducted a study on how macroeconomic factors affected the performance of the stock market in Sri Lanka. The study analyzed data from 1990 to 2012 and used indexes to investigate the relationship between macroeconomic variables such as inflation, gross domestic production, interest rates, and exchange rates. The findings of the study demonstrated that all of these factors have an inseparable impact on stock market performance and that the Sri Lankan stock market has gone through many ups and downs as a result of them.

It has been discovered that inflation and exchange rates have a higher impact on stock market performance out of all the factors studied.

According to the research, an increase in indicators such as interest rates, exchange rates, and GDP has been observed to result in improved performance of both the CCPI and ASPI. In contrast, to have a better performance in the stock market, the inflation rate should be kept to a bare minimum. Jayasundara et al., (2019) researched the relationship between macroeconomic factors and stock market performance in Sri Lanka. They analyzed monthly data from 2006 to 2016 and included two dummy variables to assess the effects of the country's civil war and the global financial crisis on share prices. The Ordinary Least Square (OLS) method was used to estimate the parameters. The findings indicate that macroeconomic variables overall impact the ASPI of Sri Lanka. Interest rates, the industrial production index, and civil war had a negative impact on ASPI, while the US Dollar exchange rate and real GDP growth rate had a positive impact on the all-share price index. The global financial crisis positively affected the all-share price index in Sri Lanka, which is contradictory to the experiences of developed countries. As a preliminary step for analyzing the time series data, the test for stationarity and the test for co-integration were performed. Here, the Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) unit root test is used to examine the existence of unit roots in the dataset. In addition to that, this study involves the Johansen co-integration test (Johansen & Juselius, 1990) using the trace statistic and the maximum eigenvalue method. Furthermore, this study utilizes the Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) to evaluate the short-run and long-term dynamics of variables in an attempt to identify the relationship between the variables. The final model was fitted using the Johansen normalization technique and the pairwise Granger causality test was performed to check the direction of causality. All the statistical analyses were performed using EViews 12.0 statistical software.

3. IV. RESULTS & DISCUSSIONS

The following table shows the summary of descriptive statistics of the variables used in this study. The sample means, median, maximum, minimum, and standard deviation have been recorded.

Macroeconomic Determinants of Stock Market Performances in Sri Lanka To have a better understanding of this study, the time-series data should satisfy some properties.

This section describes such a property called stationarity or the existence of unit roots. Here, the ADF test is utilized to find the existence of unit root using EViews statistical software on both levels and their first differences of all variables.

As a preliminary step for testing co-integration among several variables used in the above model, it is necessary to test for the presence of unit root for every individual variable using the ADF test (Dickey & Fuller, 1979) based on the auxiliary regression, . hypothesis of non-stationarity is rejected, it is possible to conclude that the series is integrated of order 1. Furthermore, for the ADF tests to be effective, it is important to choose the relevant optimal lag order such that not to reduce the power of the test. The lag order was chosen using AIC values and EViews statistical software identifies the default value of as the lag order for the ????? ((???ð??"??(?) -1)

1 3

ADF test, where denotes the variable of interest.

4. ?

The above table indicates that the critical values for the levels of all variables are not significant at the 5% and 1% significance levels. Therefore, it implies that all the variables have a unit root in their level for the ADF test. However, the ADF test results for the first differences of the variables show that the critical values for all the variables are significant at the 5% and 1% significance levels. Therefore, based on these results, we reject the null hypothesis that the presence of unit root at all first differences of the variables. As a result of this test, it can be considered that the variables are integrated of order 1, I (1). Since the series are integrated of the same order I (1), then there exists a risk of co-integration.

After showing that the variables are integrated of order I, I (1), it is necessary to determine whether there is at least one linear combination of these variables. This can be done by using the co-integration method. Along with a non-stationary series, the co-integration method has been used to investigate whether a long-run relationship exists. However, to apply the co-integration test, it is necessary to have the variables under consideration integrated in the same order. In the previous section, it is clear that the variables under consideration are integrated in the same order I (1). As an initial step for applying the co-integration tests, first, specify the relevant optimal lag order of the Vector Auto-regressive (VAR) model. By the Akaike Information Criteria using 2 maximum lags, the general VAR model indicates that the optimal lag length of 1. Based on the above unit-root tests, the Johansen co-integration test can be applied. The following vector autoregressive framework of order p can be used to express the Johansen co-integration method. To use the Johansen co-integration method, the above equation ( 4) should be turned into a vector error correction model (VECM) and it can be written as follows.

5. ? ?×?

The co-integration test between the X values is calculated by finding the rank of the matrix ? using its eigenvalues. In this test, the null hypothesis can be expressed as , ? 0 : ? = ??' where ? and ? represent loading matrices of eigenvectors with dimensions . The matrix ? is ?×? responsible for providing co-integration vectors, while ? represents the adjustment parameters. The number of co-integrating relations can be tested by using the following trace statistic and the maximum eigenvalue test statistic given below.

Trace statistic: Maximum eigenvalue statistic:

(7) ? ??? ?, ? + 1 ( ) =-???(1 -? ^?+1 )

Where, = The number of co-integrating vectors under ? the null hypothesis, = The number of observations that are usable ? and, = The value estimated for the j th ordered ? ^? characteristic root or eigenvalue from the ? matrix A significant co-integrating vector can be identified utilizing significant non-zero eigenvalues. The null hypothesis of the trace statistic suggests that the number of co-integrating vectors is less than or equal to r, whereas the alternative hypothesis suggests that there are more than r co-integrating relations. The maximum eigenvalue test indicates the null hypothesis of the number of co-integrating vectors is less than or equal to r, versus the alternative hypothesis of (r+1) co-integrating vectors. Tables 3 and4 present the results obtained from the Johansen method of both trace test and maximum eigenvalue test using EViews statistical software, starting with the null hypothesis of no co-integration (r=0) among all variables. The data reported in above Table 3 shows that the null hypothesis of no co-integrating vector or at most one co-integrating vector can be rejected at the 5% significance level, thereby suggesting the presence of two co-integrating equations.

Therefore, according to the results of Table 3 above, at a 5% significance level, the trace statistic suggests at most two co-integrating vectors (r=2) are significant.

6. Test Assumption: Linear Deterministic Trend in the Data

As the results of Table 4, the null hypothesis of no co-integrating vector can be rejected at the 5% significance level and indicates the presence of one co-integrating equation. Therefore, the maximum eigenvalue statistic suggests that at most one co-integrating vector (r=1) is significant.

Therefore, by using both trace and maximum eigenvalue tests, it can be concluded that there are The above co-integrating long-run model can be re-parameterized as follows:

(8) ????? = -9. 526???? -1. 216????? + 14. 010?????? + 74. 860????? -28. 140??? + 7. 005????? + 9. 000

In the long term, there is a significant negative statistical relationship between all share price indexes and gross domestic production, interest rates, and money supply variables. In other words, gross domestic production, interest rates, and money supply variables allow long-term all share price index values to be reduced. Moreover, there is a positive relationship between the share price index and exchange rates, inflation rates, and reserve money variables. That is exchange rates, inflation rates, and money supply variables support increasing the long-term share price index values.

The estimated coefficients, standard errors, t statistics and p values of the log-linear model (2) and its R-Squared, adjusted R-Squared values are summarized in Table 6 below. The above log-linear model can be re-parameterized as follows:

(9) ????? = 1. 926 + 0. 084???? -0. 320????? -2. 644?????? + 3. 866????? -0. 682??? + 0. 705?????

The significance of each variable is tested by using the t-test. The null hypothesis of this test stated that there is no significant impact from the independent economic variable on ASPI, whereas the alternative hypothesis stated that there is a significant relationship between the independent two co-integrating relations among the variables and it is another evidence to say that the variables are co-integrated. That is, there exists a linear combination of the I (1) variables and a stable long-run relationship.

By taking one co-integrating vector and two co-integrating vectors, the short-run and long-run interaction of the selected economic variables, the VECM has been estimated based on the Johansen co-integration method. The results demonstrate that the ASPI and the economic variables have a long-run equilibrium relationship. The estimated co-integrating coefficients for the first and second normalized eigenvectors are as follows.

Macroeconomic Determinants of Stock Market Performances in Sri Lanka economic variable on ASPI. According to the regression outputs in Table 6, using p-values, it can be considered as all the macroeconomic variables show significant effects on the ASPI of Sri Lanka at a 10% level. Additionally, using the R-squared value, it is evidence to say that 78.81% of the total variation is explained by the above log-linear model ( 9) and the adjusted R-squared in the above table suggests that the fitted model is approximately 77.96% reliable.

If it is given that a co-integrating relationship is present among the selected variables in level form, an error correction model can be estimated.

An error correction model is used to identify the short-run dynamic response of ASPI and other economic variables. The VECM is a restricted VAR developed to be utilized with known co-integrated nonstationary series. The VEC has co-integration relations built into the specification so that it restricts the long-run behaviour of the economic variables to converge to their co-integrating relationships while allowing for short-run adjustment dynamics. VECM relates changes in ASPI growth to changes in the other lagged variables and the disturbance term of lagged periods. Table 7 shows the results of the VECM short-run dynamic relationship and the short-run relationship coefficients using EViews statistical software. significant at a 1% level. The gross domestic product has a positive and significant (at 10% level) impact. In contrast, the other macroeconomic variables have a positive and insignificant (at 1% level) impact on the growth of all share price indexes of Sri Lanka. Therefore, when the GDP of the last two months are increasing, it will cause the growth in ASPI by 0.0937 units. According to the records of the past two months, the growth in ASPI has a negative and significant impact on the current growth in ASPI. Therefore, according to the above results, GDP is a significant determinant of the growth of ASPI.

The VECM can identify the short-run dynamics and the long-run equilibrium relations between the time series variables. Therefore, it can distinguish between the short-run and long-run Granger causality. In other words, the Granger causality test is used to find the joint significance of the coefficients of the differenced explanatory variables. To further understand this study, the Granger casualty test has been employed to check the direction of causality and the results are presented in Table 8. The F-statistic and probability values are estimated using 153 observations and 2 months lags under the null hypothesis of no causality. The results of the Granger Causality test indicate that the ASPI and exchange rate have a significant unidirectional causality, also the exchange rate and interest rate have a significant bidirectional causality on each other at 1% and 5% levels.

Furthermore, the GDP and interest rate have a unidirectional causality and money supply and exchange rate have a unidirectional causality. Finally, reserve money and money supply variables have a significant bidirectional causality on each other at 10% level. The results of this test also indicate that all the other pairs of variables do not have a significant causal relationship with each other at 1% and 5% levels.

7. V. CONCLUSIONS AND POLICY RECOMMENDATION

The main objective of this study is to investigate the impact of selected economic variables on the Colombo Stock Market Performances for 2008-2020. The ADF test was conducted to test the stationarity and the order of integration of all the series. It showed that all the variables are integrated in the same order I (1). The Johansen co-integration test results indicate a long-run relationship between the variables. The optimal lag length for each VAR model was selected by minimizing the Akaike Information criteria, and the final analysis used a lag length of 2. The estimated regression model shows a positive relationship between ASPI with GDP, Inflation rate and Reserve money. Simultaneously, there is a negative relationship between the Interest rate, Exchange rate and Money Supply. The VECM model shows that there is a long-run relationship between the ASPI and all other variables during the first two-month lags and especially the gross domestic product has a positive and significant impact on the growth of ASPI for the last two-month lags. The results of Granger's causality test indicate a significant effect of ASPI on the exchange rate, and it is not affected by the other variables. Finally, the overall findings suggest that all the selected economic variables have been significantly affected by the ASPI. Those variables are the most powerful estimators for estimating the Stock market performances of Sri Lanka.

Figure 1. 2 Macroeconomic
2
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Sri Lanka's capital market has undergone
tremendous change after the reception of the
liberalization policy. It has become more open to
international investors, especially in the context of
the post-war economy and subsequent economic
revitalizations in Sri Lanka.
Figure 5.
III. METHODOLOGY & DATA of the Colombo stock market performance, Sri
Lanka. The interest rate was measured by using
The main objective of this study is to investigate
90 days treasury bonds and the inflation rate was
the relationship between the All-Share Price Index
measured by using Colombo Consumer Price
(ASPI) of the Colombo Stock Exchange and six
Index on the base of 2013(100). Sri Lankan
major macroeconomic variables: Gross Domestic
Rupees per unit of US dollar (USD) was taken as
Production (GDP), Interest Rate, Exchange Rate,
the exchange rate, and the money supply was
Inflation Rate, Money Supply and Reserve Money
measured using the M2b indicator. The following
of Sri Lanka using monthly time series data
linear model is proposed to establish the
between 2008 and 2020. The data were obtained
relationship between ASPI and selected
from the CSE data library and central bank
macroeconomic factors in Sri Lanka.
publications. Here, the ASPI variable is
considered as a proxy to measure the performance
???? = ð??" ???, ????, ???, ????, ??, ???? ( ) (1)
For the convenience of estimation, all the above variables are expressed as a log-linear model as follows
?????? ? = ? 0 + ? 1 ????? ? + ? 2 ?????? ? + ? 3 ????? ? + ? 4 ?????? ? + ? 5 ???? ? + ? 6 ?????? ? + ? ? (2)
Where;
?????? represents the log of ASPI at time t;
?
???? ? represents the log of Money supply at time t;
?????? ? represents the log of Reserve money at time t;
? is any given time;
? ? is the error term;
? 0 is a constant and;
? 1 , ? 2 , ? 3 , ? 4 , ? 5 , ? 6 are the sensitivity parameters of each macroeconomic variable to the performance of
the Colombo stock market, Sri Lanka.
Note:

? represents the log of GDP at time t; ????? ? represents the log of Interest rate at time t; ?????? ? represents the log of the Exchange rate at time t; ????? ? represents the log of the Inflation rate at time t; ??????

Figure 6. Table 1 :
1
Money
Interest Exchange Inflation Reserve
ASPI GDP Supply
Rate Rate Rate Money
(M2b)
Mean 5516.768 21571.790 9.935 138.066 104.378 4200779.000 657344.000
Median 6014.950 19107.960 9.450 131.350 104.750 3600429.000 624946.100
Maximum 7798.000 212302.000 19.600 193.090 138.000 9405734.000 1021589.000
Minimum 1503.000 9540.311 4.860 107.6 69.700 1398625.000 258097.000
Std. Dev 1599.069 27087.87 3.502 24.846 18.725 2249164.000 251173.600
Figure 7. Table 2 :
2
?
?? ? = ? + ?? + ?? ?-1 + ?=1 ? ??? ?-1 + ?
? ?
Where;
?? ?-1 = The lagged first differences,
? ? = The serial correlation errors and,
, , and are the parameters to be estimated. ? ? ? ?
The null hypothesis for a unit root in variable ? ? is ? 0 : ? = 0 and the alternative hypothesis is
. The following table describes the results of the ADF unit root test. 0 : ? < 0 ?
First
Variables Levels 5% Critical Value 1% Critical Value
Difference
Log ASPI -2.011 -12.229 -2.880 -3.473
Log GDP -1.040 -7.912 -2.882 -3.476
Log Interest Rate -1.906 -8.042 -2.880 -3.473
Log Exchange Rate -0.052 -8.261 -2.880 -3.473
Log Inflation Rate -1.228 -7.737 -2.880 -3.474
Log Money Supply (M2b) -0.094 -11.140 -2.880 -3.473
Log Reserve Money -1.890 -12.695 -2.880 -3.473
Note:

?The above ADF auxiliary regression tests for the existence of a unit root in at time t.If the test statistic values of the ADF test are larger than the critical value, then the null hypothesis is not rejected. Therefore, in such cases, we conclude that the variable under consideration is not stationary. That is, it has a unit root. This procedure should be applied once again after having transformed the series under consideration in the first differencing. If the null Macroeconomic Determinants of Stock Market Performances in Sri Lanka

Figure 8. Table 3 :
3
Eigenvalue Trace Statistic 5% Critical Value P -Value No. of CE (s)
0.341 161.283 125.615 0.000 None
0.223 97.399 95.754 0.038 At most 1
0.158 58.833 69.819 0.273 At most 2
0.104 32.502 47.856 0.584 At most 3
0.060 15.687 29.797 0.734 At most 4
0.040 6.255 15.495 0.665 At most 5
Note:

SERIES: LASPI, LGDP, LINTR, LEXR, LINFR, LMS, LRESM

Figure 9. Table 4 :
4
Test Assumption: Linear Deterministic Trend in
the Data
Eigenvalue Max-Eigen Statistic 5% Critical Value P -Value No. of CE (s)
0.341 63.884 46.231 0.000 None
0.223 38.566 40.078 0.073 At most 1
0.158 26.331 33.877 0.301 At most 2
0.104 16.815 27.584 0.596 At most 3
0.060 9.432 21.132 0.796 At most 4
0.040 6.252 14.265 0.581 At most 5
SERIES: LASPI, LGDP, LINTR, LEXR, LINFR, LMS, LRESM
Figure 10. Table 5 :
5
Equation Type Log Log Log Interest Log Exchange Log Inflation Log Money Log Reserve Constant
ASPI GDP Rate Rate Rate Supply Money
One co-integrating 1.000 (1.145) 9.526 (1.234) 1.216 (9.679) -14.010 (19.234) -74.860 (9.585) 28.140 (3.934) -7.005 -9.000
equation
1.000 0.000 0.222 2.107 -7.827 2.002 -0.711
Two (0.103) (0.804) (1.492) (0.772) (0.325)
co-integrating
equations 0.000 1.000 0.104 -1.692 -7.037 2.744 -0.661
(0.128) (1.000) (1.857) (0.961) (0.404)
Figure 11. Table 6 :
6
Dependent Variable: LASPI
Method: Least Squares
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-statistic Prob.
Intercept 1.926 0.323 5.958 0.000***
Log GDP 0.084 0.048 1.752 0.082*
Log Interest Rate -0.320 0.062 -5.202 0.000***
Log Exchange Rate -2.644 0.458 -5.767 0.000***
Log Inflation Rate 3.866 0.816 4.741 0.000***
Log Money Supply -0.682 0.410 -1.664 0.098*
Log Reserve Money 0.705 0.189 3.734 0.000***
R-Squared 0.7881
Adjusted R-Squared 0.7796
Note: *Denotes significance at 10% level. **denotes significance at the 5% level and ***denotes significance at the
1% level.
Figure 12. Table 7 :
7
Dependent Variable Î?"(LASPI)
153 observations are used after adjustments
Variables Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic P-value
ECT -0.0065 0.0055 -1.1858 0.2375
Î?" (LASPI(-1)) -0.4796 0.0843 -5.6873 0.0000***
Î?" (LASPI(-2)) -0.1896 0.0848 -2.2363 0.0268**
Î?" (LGDP(-1)) 0.0747 0.0555 1.3453 0.1805
Î?" (LGDP(-2)) 0.0937 0.0544 1.7240 0.0867*
Î?" (LINTR(-1)) 0.1644 0.2556 0.6433 0.1024
Î?" (LINTR(-2)) -0.2504 0.2485 -1.0076 0.3152
Î?" (LEXR(-1)) -1.6721 1.2191 -1.3716 0.1722
Î?" (LEXT(-2)) -0.3305 1.2234 0.2701 0.7874
Î?" (LINFR(-1)) 0.2442 1.1342 0.2153 0.8298
Î?" (LINFR(-2)) -0.5311 1.1088 -0.4790 0.6326
Î?" (LMS(-1)) 1.3582 1.8022 0.7536 0.4522
Î?" (LMS(-2)) 2.4823 1.7897 1.3870 0.1675
Î?" (LRESM(-1)) -0.0833 0.4108 -0.2029 0.8395
Î?" (LRESM(-2)) -0.0873 0.4134 -0.2111 0.8331
Constant -0.0134 0.0139 -0.9667 0.3352
Note: *Denotes significance at 10% level. **denotes significance at the 5% level and ***denotes significance at the
1% level.
The VECM short-run results are presented in disequilibria in ASPI of the previous month's
Table 7. It is evident that Î?" (LASPI (-1)) and Î?" affect back to the long-run equilibrium in the
(LASPI (-2)) are statistically significant at a 5% current month. The interest rates, US dollar
level with priori expected signs. The coefficient of exchange rates, inflation rates and reserve money
Error Correction Term (ECT) is correct in sign variables had a negative impact on the growth of
and insignificant. However, it is fairly small, that the all-share price index of Sri Lanka for the last
is, 0.0065. This implies, nearly 0.65% of the two months and those effects are not statistically
Note:

Macroeconomic Determinants of Stock Market Performances in Sri Lanka

Figure 13. Table 8 :
8
Null Hypothesis F -statistic Prob.
Î?"(LGDP) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LASPI) 1.105 0.334
Î?"(LASPI) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LGDP) 0.051 0.951
Î?"(LINTR) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LASPI) 1.465 0.234
Î?"(LASPI) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LINTR) 0.288 0.750
Î?"(LEXR) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LASPI) 0.910 0.405
Î?"(LASPI) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LEXR) 8.070 0.001***
Î?"(LINFR) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LASPI) 0.068 0.934
Î?"(LASPI) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LINFR) 1.798 0.169
Î?"(LMS) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LASPI) 0.747 0.476
Î?"(LASPI) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LMS) 0.848 0.430
Î?"(LRESM) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LASPI) 0.003 0.998
Î?"(LASPI) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LRESM) 0.630 0.534
Î?"(LINTR) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LGDP) 0.106 0.900
Î?"(LGDP) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LINTR) 2.960 0.055*
Î?"(LEXR) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LGDP) 0.206 0.814
Î?"(LGDP) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LEXR) 0.307 0.736
Î?"(LINFR) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LGDP) 0.135 0.874
Î?"(LGDP) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LINFR) 0.323 0.725
Î?"(LMS) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LGDP) 1.396 0.251
Î?"(LGDP) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LMS) 0.815 0.445
Î?"(LRESM) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LGDP) 0.671 0.513
Î?"(LGDP) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LRESM) 0.090 0.914
Î?"(LEXR) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LINTR) 5.021 0.008***
Î?"(LINTR) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LEXR) 5.292 0.006***
Î?"(LINFR) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LINTR) 0.300 0.741
Î?"(LINTR) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LINFR) 0.394 0.675
Î?"(LMS) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LINTR) 1.563 0.213
Î?"(LINTR) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LMS) 0.242 0.785
Î?"(LRESM) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LINTR) 0.109 0.897
Î?"(LINTR) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LRESM) 1.030 0.340
Î?"(LINFR) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LEXR) 0.584 0.559
Î?"(LEXR) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LINFR) 0.498 0.609
Î?"(LMS) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LEXR) 2.363 0.098*
Î?"(LEXR) does not Granger Cause Î?"(LMS) 1.256 0.288
1
2

Appendix A

  1. Macro-economic Influences on the Stock Market: Evidence from an Emerging Market in South Asia. A Gunasekarage , A Pisedtasalasai , D M Power . South Asia Economic Journal 2004. 3 (3) p. .
  2. Contribution Of Macroeconomic Factors. A Jahufer , S S Irfan . Journal of Management 2014. 10 (1) p. .
  3. Effect of Exchange-rate Volatility on Foreign Direct Investment in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Case of Ghana. A K Coleman , K F A Tettey . Journal of Risk Finance 2008. 9 (1) p. .
  4. Impact of Money Supply on Sri Lankan Economy: An Econometric Analysis. A L Aslam . International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 2016. 67 p. .
  5. Stock Market Performance and Economic Growth: The Case of Sri Lanka. A R Athapathu , P Jayasinghe . International Research Conference on Management & Finance, 2012. p. .
  6. Factors Affecting Performance of Stock Market: Evidence from South Asian Countries. Aurangzeb . International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 2012. 2 (9) p. .
  7. The Relationship Between Inflation and Stock Market: Evidence from Malaysia, United States and China. C Geetha , R Mohidin , V V Chandran , V Chong . International Journal of Economics and Management Science 2011. 1 (2) p. .
  8. Sensitivity of Stock Prices to Economic Events: Econometric Evidence from Sri Lankan Stock Market and US Stock Market. D A I Dayarathne , R Lakshman . Sabaragamuwa University Journal 2012. 11 (1) p. .
  9. Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. D A Dickey , W A Fuller . Journal of the American Statistical Association 1979. 74 (366) p. .
  10. Macroeconomic Variables, Volatility and Stock Market Returns: A Case of Nairobi Securities Exchange. E Kirui , N H W Wawire , P O Onono . Kenya. International Journal of Economics and Finance 2014. 6 (8) p. .
  11. Impact of Economic Factors on the Stock Prices at Amman Stock Market (1992-2010). G F Momani , M A Alsharari . International Journal of Economics and Finance 2011. 4 (1) p. .
  12. The Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on Amman Stock Market Returns. H M El-Nader , A D Alraimony . International Journal of Economics and Finance 2012. 4 (12) p. .
  13. The Effects of Macroeconomic Factors on Stock Returns: Istanbul Stock Market. H Rjoub , T Tursoy , N Günsel . Studies in Economics and Finance 2009. 26 (1) p. .
  14. Impact of Macroeconomic Variables on Stock Market Performances: Evidence from Sri Lanka. J M D P Jayasundara , R M A K Rathnayake , P J Fernando . Journal of Business Economics 2019. 8 (8) p. .
  15. Impact of Macroeconomic Indicators on Indian Capital Markets. K Pal , R Mittal . Journal of Risk Finance 2011. 12 (2) p. .
  16. The Effect of Macroeconomic Variables on Stock Prices in Emerging Sri Lankan Stock Market. L M C S Menike . Sabaragamuwa University Journal 2006. 6 (1) p. .
  17. Relationship Between Inflation and Stock Market Return in Sri Lanka. M A T P Gunawardhana , A M M Mustafa . Journal of Business Economics 2020. 2 (1) p. .
  18. The Determinants of Economic Growth in Pakistan: Does Stock Market Development Play a Major Role?. M M Rahman , M Salahuddin . Economic Issues Journal Articles, Economic Issues 2010. 15 (2) p. .
  19. Effect Of Macroeconomic Variables on Stock Returns of Listed Commercial Banks in Kenya. M Mugambi , T C Okech . International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management 2016. 4 (6) p. .
  20. The Impact of Macroeconomic Variables on Stock Market Performance in Sri Lanka. Nanayakkara , G A Darshi . Sri Lanka International Conference on Contemporary Management, 2015.
  21. Economic Forces and the Stock Market. N F Chen , R Richard , RossA S . The Journal of Business 1986. 59 (3) p. .
  22. The Impact of Macroeconomic Fundamentals on Stock Prices Revised: Evidence from Indian Data. P K Naik , P Padhi . Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics 2012. 2012. (10) p. .
  23. Stock Market Returns and Inflation: Sri Lankan Evidence. P L Samarakoon . Sri Lankan Journal of Management 1996. 1 (4) p. .
  24. Weak Form Efficiency in Indian Stock Markets. R Gupta , P K Basu . International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER) 2011. 6 (3) p. .
  25. Stock market development and long-run growth. R Levine , S Zervos . World Bank Economic Review 1996. 10 (2) p. .
  26. Empirical Investigation of Stock Market Behavior in the Colombo Stock Exchange. R M K T Rathnayaka , D M K N Seneviratna , S C Nagahawatta . Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Management and Economics, (the 3rd International Conference on Management and Economics) 2014. 2014. p. .
  27. Impact of Macroeconomic Variables on Stock Market Returns: A Case Study of Colombo Stock Exchange, Sri Lanka. R M K T Rathnayaka , D M K Seneviratna . Kelaniya Journal of Management 2018. 6 (0) p. .
  28. Determinants of Stock Market Performance. NCC (Nepal Commerce Campus. R Rakhal . Journal 2015. 3 (1) p. .
  29. Impact of Macroeconomics Variables on Stock Prices: Empirical Evidence in Case of KSE (Karachi Stock Exchange). S D Mohammad , A Hussain , M A Jalil , A Ali . European Journal of Scientific Research 2009. 38 (1) p. .
  30. Stock Market Performance and the Macroeconomic Factors: Evidence from Colombo Stock Exchange (CSE). S Garthika , R P C Rajapakse . International Journal of Research 2018. 5 (20) p. .
  31. Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration-With Applications to The Demand for Money. S Johansen , K Juselius . Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 1990. 52 (2) p. .
  32. The Effects of Macroeconomic Factors on the Performance of Stock Market in Sri Lanka. S U Badullahewage . International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development 2018. 3 (6) p. .
  33. Macroeconomic Factor and Stock Returns: Evidence from Taiwan. T S Singh , S Mehta , M Varsha . Journal of Economics and International Finance 2011. 2 (4) p. .
  34. Macroeconomic Determinants of Stock Market Development. V F Garcia , L Liu . Journal of Applied Economics 1999. 2 (1) p. .
  35. The Relationship Between Stock Returns and Interest Rates in Sri Lanka. V Premawardhana . Sri Lankan Journal of Management 1997. 2 (3) p. .
  36. Stock Market Performance and Macroeconomic Factors: The Study of Indian Equity Market. V Tripathi , R Seth . Global Business Review 2014. 15 (2) p. .
  37. Exchange Rate and Economic Performance -A Comparative Study of Developed and Developing Countries. Z A Z Aslam . IOSR Journal of Business and Management 2013. 8 (1) p. .
Notes
1

© 2023 Great ] Britain Journals Press Volume 23 | Issue 5 | Compilation 1.0

2

Macroeconomic Determinants of Stock Market Performances in Sri Lanka © 2023 Great ] Britain Journals Press Volume 23 | Issue 5 | Compilation 1.0

Date: 1970-01-01